<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital music outlook : device operability gains backers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/</link>
	<description>With UbiKann, I Can Be Everywhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Apple open up iTunes I&#8217;ll buy at UbiKann</title>
		<link>http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>When Apple open up iTunes I&#8217;ll buy at UbiKann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey the proprietary formats are ridiculous anyway.        &#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey the proprietary formats are ridiculous anyway.        &#160;&#160; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#8216;channel&#8217; pass for TV series via the Internet at UbiKann</title>
		<link>http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8216;channel&#8217; pass for TV series via the Internet at UbiKann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ubikann.com/2006/04/01/digital-music-outlook-device-operability-gains-backers/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] It seems to me that this is, yet again, an example of the same reaction that the music industry had to MP3 or from a wider perspective to digital music. I already discussed how the will to restrict users so much on what they could do with music and what format it could be in was a really bad move from the music industry. Rather than looking at innovating ways to provide different distribution solutions they spent it on taking people to court which didn&#039;t get them much sympathy either. A bit of a Public Relations disasterâ€¦ [...]
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems to me that this is, yet again, an example of the same reaction that the music industry had to MP3 or from a wider perspective to digital music. I already discussed how the will to restrict users so much on what they could do with music and what format it could be in was a really bad move from the music industry. Rather than looking at innovating ways to provide different distribution solutions they spent it on taking people to court which didn&#8217;t get them much sympathy either. A bit of a Public Relations disasterâ€¦ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

